RWT Redwood Trust, Inc.
XNYS
3.13
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $2.88 – $6.97
- YTD
- -44.60%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 32.91
- Straddle Price
- $7.75
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 16.38
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
- Open
- $3.10
- Day Range
- $3.07 – $3.15
- Volume
- 773,511
- Prev Close
- $3.12
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.10 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.17% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.35% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +128.8pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-14.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -0.7% |
| Book / Price | 237.2% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 26.43 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $3.93 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $3.32 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1115.9% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $25.1B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $9.08 | 28% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 4.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 31.9× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $5.07 | 13% | median 0.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $3.93 | 59% | stability 85% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (6798) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
- Employees
- 351
- List Date
- 1995-08-04
- CIK
- 0000930236
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-03 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.22 (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- Mill Valley, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.redwoodtrust.com
Redwood Trust Inc is a specialty finance company focused on several distinct areas of housing credit. The company delivers customized housing credit investments to a diverse mix of investors through securitization platforms, whole-loan distribution activities, and its publicly traded securities. The company has four reportable segments: Sequoia Mortgage Banking, CoreVest Mortgage Banking, Redwood Investments, and Legacy Investments. Maximum revenue is generated from the Sequoia Mortgage Banking segment, comprising a mortgage loan conduit that acquires residential consumer loans from third-part…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.70% | -7.92% | 19.60% | -7.45% | 0.92% | -3.01% | 0.47% |
| Feb | 12.07% | -15.04% | -11.10% | -10.77% | 3.09% | 11.21% | -1.76% |
| Mar | 5.15% | 2.73% | -10.25% | 3.75% | -6.90% | -7.88% | -2.23% |
| Apr | 3.93% | -7.97% | -6.27% | -12.08% | 2.64% | -1.42% | -3.53% |
| May | -1.07% | 5.59% | -1.66% | 2.59% | -6.52% | -5.41% | -1.08% |
| Jun | 7.00% | -25.22% | 4.43% | 1.56% | 9.44% | -10.90% | -2.28% |
| Jul | -2.06% | 9.90% | 18.03% | 14.13% | -9.60% | -2.87% | 4.59% |
| Aug | 5.14% | -8.93% | 6.37% | 7.07% | 12.09% | 0.00% | 3.62% |
| Sep | 2.79% | -22.95% | -13.26% | 4.32% | -3.18% | -12.22% | -7.42% |
| Oct | 3.04% | 25.97% | -9.90% | -3.81% | -9.85% | -13.97%* | -1.42% |
| Nov | -8.17% | 10.80% | 11.44% | -1.51% | 7.41% | -- | 3.99% |
| Dec | 5.27% | -14.43% | 2.07% | -9.18% | -0.90% | -- | -3.43% |
| Total | 37.64% | -46.21% | 2.52% | -13.91% | -4.25% | -39.45% | -10.61% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a consolidation phase, with RSI indicating a neutral market condition.
- Trend indicators show a weak trend regime, which may lead to range-bound trading.
Primary Risks:
- Market sentiment has turned bearish due to recent negative news headlines.
- Volatility is currently low, but options data suggests medium volatility expectations.
Investment Thesis: RWT's stock price has been consolidating within a relatively narrow range. Recent negative news headlines have weighed on the stock, leading to increased volatility. The company's dividend yield is attractive, but concerns about interest rate hikes and potential dividend cuts may continue to influence investor sentiment.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a bearish impact on RWT's stock price, with negative sentiment dominating the narrative. However, some neutral headlines suggest that investors are taking a cautious approach, waiting for more concrete signs of change before making significant moves.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidation
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Weak trend regime
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower band: $4.40
- Middle band: $4.83
- Upper band: $5.27
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (42.51) MACD signal: Bearish (-0.11 / Signal: -0.02) Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 1885345.65
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 17608032.53
- Volume Rate of Change: -55.50%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been negative, with concerns about interest rate hikes and potential dividend cuts weighing on the stock.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is bearish due to recent negative news headlines.
Catalyst Identification: No clear catalysts are driving the market at this time. However, upcoming earnings announcements may provide a spark for further price movement.
Market Narrative: The market narrative is dominated by concerns about interest rate hikes and potential dividend cuts, leading to increased volatility and caution among investors.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment: Beta: 0.70 (vs SPY) - low risk relative to the broader market Volatility Regime: Low - stock moves less than the market
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: 29.6% (Medium) Current IV: 84.4% Expected Move: $0.53 (38 DTE), 7-DTE: $0.55 Volume Flow: 40 calls vs 16 puts Open Interest: 161 calls vs 2 puts
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations will be crucial in navigating potential market volatility.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: RWT's sector (Financials) is performing relatively poorly compared to the broader market.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but this may not translate into significant price movement without a catalyst.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has low correlation with the broader market, indicating that it may behave independently of market trends.
Relative Valuation: RWT's stock price is within its trading range, making it a relatively neutral investment opportunity at present.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $4.40
- Resistance: $5.27
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear technical levels have been breached, but potential breakouts or breakdowns could occur if the stock price approaches the upper or lower band.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings announcements may provide a catalyst for further price movement.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations will be crucial in navigating potential market volatility.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-10 | After-Close | 8.87% | 2.27% | 0.26x | Within |
| 2021-04-28 | After-Close | 9.19% | 0.37% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2021-07-28 | After-Close | 10.97% | 2.62% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2021-10-27 | After-Close | 9.23% | 3.03% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2022-02-09 | After-Close | 5.08% | 8.36% | 1.65x | Exceeded |
| 2022-04-28 | After-Close | 1.66% | 7.18% | 4.33x | Exceeded |
| 2022-07-28 | After-Close | 15.24% | 1.48% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2022-10-13 | After-Close | 18.12% | 0.49% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2023-01-09 | After-Close | 6.84% | 0.84% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2023-04-27 | After-Close | 8.76% | 5.14% | 0.59x | Within |
| 2023-07-27 | After-Close | 5.81% | 8.14% | 1.40x | Exceeded |
| 2023-10-30 | After-Close | 6.99% | 8.59% | 1.23x | Exceeded |
| 2024-01-17 | After-Close | 4.41% | 0.59% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2024-04-30 | After-Close | 11.93% | 11.75% | 0.98x | Within |
| 2024-08-01 | Pre-Market | 8.25% | 2.75% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2024-10-30 | After-Close | 8.84% | 4.19% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2025-02-13 | After-Close | 10.06% | 1.24% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2025-04-30 | Pre-Market | 8.84% | 0.16% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-07-30 | After-Close | 8.50% | 2.33% | 0.27x | Within |
| 2025-10-29 | After-Close | 15.03% | 2.73% | 0.18x | Within |
| 2026-02-11 | Pre-Market | 10.68% | 1.42% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2026-04-29 | After-Close | 20.50% | 0.89% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2026-07-28 | After-Close | 12.31% | 0.21% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-10-13 | After-Close | 5.74% | 3.28% | 0.57x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
RWT Options Activity & IV Rank
RWT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 63rd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oaktree Capital Asset manager Howard Marks | $8.0M | #81 of 130 | -4.4% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $3.5M | #1094 of 1945 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $916K | #3791 of 6285 | +13.7% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $813K | #2410 of 3138 | +358.8% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $97K | #3620 of 3716 | -52.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $0K | #4639 of 4729 | -47.3% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
RWT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $692.51K | 49.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $251.22K | 18.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $159.55K | 11.47% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $127.51K | 9.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $75.84K | 5.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $70.15K | 5.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $13.75K | 0.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HBK INVESTMENTS L P | $1.01M | 43.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $628.05K | 26.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $485.38K | 20.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $109.02K | 4.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $55.46K | 2.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $48.35K | 2.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $4.27K | 0.18% | 2026-06-30 |
RWT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-30| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Horvath D Debora | Director | Grant (A) | +15,058 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | Greg H Kubicek | Director | Grant (A) | +28,951 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-21 | Sasha G. Macomber | Chief Human Resource Officer | Buy (P) | +4,895 | $4.08 | $20.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-21 | Andrew P Stone | Chief Legal Officer | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $4.12 | $20.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-18 | Christopher J Abate | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +100,000 | $3.84 | $383.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | Dashiell I Robinson | President | Buy (P) | +63,211 | $3.98 | $251.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Brooke Carillo | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +26,065 | $3.85 | $100.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Christopher J Abate | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +100,000 | $3.84 | $383.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Greg H Kubicek | Director | Buy (P) | +50,000 | $3.85 | $192.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Horvath D Debora | Director | Grant (A) | +11,739 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Greg H Kubicek | Director | Grant (A) | +22,072 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Doneene K Damon | Director | Exer (M) | +4,975 | $4.87 | $24.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Horvath D Debora | Director | Exer (M) | +7,259 | $4.73 | $34.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Faith A Schwartz | Director | Exer (M) | +20,729 | $5.28 | $109.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Douglas B Hansen | Director | Exer (M) | +20,729 | $5.28 | $109.4K | EDGAR |
RWT Insider Holdings
11 insiders · @ $3.13| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christopher J Abate | Chief Executive Officer | 1,358,566 | $4.26M | $619.6K | 66 | 2026-09-18 |
| 2 | Douglas B Hansen | Director | 431,120 | $1.35M | $0 | 40 | 2026-05-27 |
| 3 | Dashiell I Robinson | President | 395,050 | $1.24M | $251.6K | 22 | 2026-09-16 |
| 4 | Andrew P Stone | Chief Legal Officer | 183,631 | $575.7K | -$1.27M | 41 | 2026-09-21 |
| 5 | Horvath D Debora | Director | 156,295 | $490.0K | $100.0K | 45 | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | Brooke Carillo | Chief Financial Officer | 140,481 | $440.4K | $444.1K | 14 | 2026-09-15 |
| 7 | Sasha G. Macomber | Chief Human Resource Officer | 95,298 | $298.8K | $32.9K | 21 | 2026-09-21 |
| 8 | Faith A Schwartz | Director | 52,551 | $164.7K | $0 | 16 | 2026-05-27 |
| 9 | Armando Falcon | Director | 52,551 | $164.7K | $0 | 15 | 2026-05-27 |
| 10 | Greg H Kubicek | Director | 27,148 | $85.1K | $606.3K | 131 | 2026-09-30 |
RWT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 30, 2026Directors 9
- Douglas B Hansen · on file since 2006
- Greg H Kubicek · on file since 2006
- Georganne Proctor · since Mar 9, 2006
- Horvath D Debora · since Mar 24, 2016
- Christopher J Abate · listed since Dec 2017
- Armando Falcon · since Mar 30, 2021
- Faith A Schwartz · since Mar 30, 2021
- Dashiell I Robinson · listed since Dec 2021
- Doneene K Damon · since Nov 2, 2023
Officers 5
- Christopher J Abate · Chief Executive Officer · listed since May 2018
- Dashiell I Robinson · President · listed since May 2018
- Brooke Carillo · Chief Financial Officer · since May 31, 2021
- Sasha G. Macomber · Chief Human Resource Officer · since Dec 1, 2018
- Andrew P Stone · Chief Legal Officer · listed since Dec 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (26)
| Nov 2, 2023 | Doneene K Damon became a director |
| Aug 29, 2023 | The company announced the departure of George W Madison from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 24, 2023 | Fred Matera no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Feb 24, 2023 | Fred Matera listed as Chief Investment Officer (previously Head of Residential) in SEC filings |
| Dec 16, 2021 | Dashiell I Robinson first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 16, 2021 | Andrew P Stone listed as Chief Legal Officer (previously General Counsel) in SEC filings |
| Oct 8, 2021 | Collin L. Cochrane listed as Chief Accounting Officer (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| May 31, 2021 | Brooke Carillo became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 30, 2021 | Faith A Schwartz became a director |
| Mar 30, 2021 | Armando Falcon became a director |
| Sep 2, 2020 | Fred Matera listed as Head of Residential (previously Managing Director) in SEC filings |
| Aug 4, 2020 | Fred Matera first listed as Managing Director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 1, 2020 | George W Madison became a director |
| Mar 1, 2019 | Fred Matera no longer listed as Chief Investment Officer in SEC filings |
| Mar 1, 2019 | Fred Matera first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 1, 2018 | Sasha G. Macomber became Chief Human Resource Officer |
| Aug 2, 2018 | Bondar Lola became Controller, Managing Director |
| May 24, 2018 | Dashiell I Robinson listed as President (previously Executive Vice-President) in SEC filings |
| May 24, 2018 | Christopher J Abate listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously President) in SEC filings |
| Dec 14, 2017 | Garnet W Kanouse listed as Managing Director (previously Managing Director, Head of Residential) in SEC filings |
| Dec 14, 2017 | Christopher J Abate listed as President (previously President & CFO) in SEC filings |
| Dec 14, 2017 | Christopher J Abate first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Sep 28, 2017 | Dashiell I Robinson became Executive Vice-President |
| Sep 5, 2017 | Collin L. Cochrane listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously Controller, Managing Director) in SEC filings |
| May 18, 2017 | Garnet W Kanouse became Managing Director, Head of Residential |
| Dec 16, 2016 | Christopher J Abate listed as President & CFO (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (10)
- Fred Matera · Last reported as Chief Investment Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 21, 2023
- Collin L. Cochrane · Last reported as Chief Accounting Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 21, 2023
- Richard Baum · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 18, 2022
- Jeffrey T Pero · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 18, 2022
- Mariann H Byerwalter · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 22, 2020
- Shoshone (Bo) Stern · Last reported as Chief Investment Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2019
- Garnet W Kanouse · Last reported as Managing Director in an SEC filing dated Dec 13, 2019
- Bondar Lola · Last reported as Controller, Managing Director in an SEC filing dated Mar 4, 2019
- Karen R Pallotta · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 22, 2018
- Martin S Hughes · Last reported as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 1, 2018
RWT Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-20What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | Georganne C. Proctor | Director | 140,000 | $735.0K | 2026-05-20 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-23 | Stone Andrew P | Officer, Chief Legal Officer | 13,844 | $92.0K | 2024-12-23 | Georgeson Securities Corp | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $15.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | KBWD Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF | Invesco | 3.01% | $9.9M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $9.3M | $74.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 4 | PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $6.1M | $11.9B | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | Global X | 0.49% | $5.8M | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 6 | REM iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.27% | $5.7M | $458.1M | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $5.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | MORT VanEck Mortgage REIT Income ETF | VanEck | 1.24% | $3.9M | $319.5M | 2026-10-21 |
| 9 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.04% | $3.6M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 10 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $3.4M | $13.9B | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $3.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 12 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $2.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | RIET Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF | Nport | 1.20% | $1.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 14 | SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF | Nport | 0.40% | $1.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 15 | VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $797,441 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $674,057 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 17 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $615,139 | $96.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 18 | ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF | Nport | 0.17% | $525,095 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 19 | VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $451,434 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 20 | SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $376,002 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 21 | PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF | Invesco | 0.01% | $203,253 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.01% | $193,184 | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 23 | FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $106,924 | $2.3B | 2026-10-21 |
| 24 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $98,605 | $20.4B | 2026-10-21 |
| 25 | OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | Invesco | 0.02% | $56,067 | — | 2026-10-21 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | — | $-8.51M | $-0.07 | $-4.51B |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | $16.81M | $0.13 | $-3.36B |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | — | $-10.81M | $-0.08 | $-2.67B |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | — | $-101.66M | $-0.76 | $-2.11B |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | — | $12.98M | $0.10 | $-1.95B |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | $-9.65M | $-0.08 | $-853.98M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | — | $11.99M | $0.09 | $-2.09B |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | — | $12.79M | $0.10 | $-1.97B |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | — | $28.51M | $0.21 | $-954.17M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | $15.29M | $0.16 | $-2.15B |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | — | $-32.56M | $-0.29 | $114.88M |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | — | $1.11M | — | $-78.44M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.