SIDU Sidus Space, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
1.16
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
SIDU
$1.16
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$1.16
- 52-Week Range
- $0.63 – $6.79
- YTD
- -73.33%
- Straddle Price
- $0.38
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.98
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Open
- $0.99
- Day Range
- $0.97 – $1.21
- Volume
- 3,680,926
- Prev Close
- $0.99
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.90% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.97% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +243.0pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -14.5% |
| Book / Price | 47.2% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -145.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -872.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.63 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.14 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 38.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: ASTS, ECHO, GOGO, SPIR, VSAT
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
60-Day Conviction
50%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$1.16
α +1.3%
rank 64%
conviction
79%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$1.16
α +1.6%
rank 60%
conviction
54%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$1.17
α +1.9%
rank 58%
conviction
50%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 7.1× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $0.98 | 16% | median 2.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/S | $0.07 | 16% | median 2.1× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.63 | 69% | stability 85% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- RADIOTELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (4812) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 99
- List Date
- 2021-12-14
- CIK
- 0001879726
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13 (After-Close)
- Headquarters
- Cape Canaveral, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.sidusspace.com
Sidus Space Inc is a space and defense technology company with core capabilities that include dual use satellite manufacturing & technology integration, AI products and services, space and defense hardware components and space-based data solutions. The company generates revenue through a combination of: Satellite platform sales and customization, Payload hosting and mission services, Engineering and systems integration services, and Space and defense hardware manufacturing. The firm supports Commercial Space, Aerospace, Defense, Underwater Marine, and other commercial and government customers.…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 7.47% | -59.80% | -31.13% | -18.69% | -35.33% | -27.50% |
| Feb | -- | -52.69% | 91.52% | 99.56% | -18.53% | -24.42% | 19.09% |
| Mar | -- | -23.21% | -37.25% | -44.97% | -20.00% | 14.29% | -22.23% |
| Apr | -- | -31.13% | -54.08% | 5.99% | 11.27% | 56.19% | -2.35% |
| May | -- | -20.91% | -15.64% | -17.77% | -11.39% | 45.27% | -4.09% |
| Jun | -- | 79.35% | -12.05% | -10.69% | 21.83% | -36.71% | 8.35% |
| Jul | -- | 13.87% | -7.48% | 14.29% | -34.83% | -37.25% | -10.28% |
| Aug | -- | -17.02% | -12.47% | 39.33% | 9.57% | 9.05% | 5.69% |
| Sep | -- | -20.97% | -3.83% | -6.04% | -14.05% | -14.62% | -11.90% |
| Oct | -- | -21.27% | -34.29% | -15.36% | 3.67% | -38.76% | -21.20% |
| Nov | -- | 0.00% | -39.18% | -35.62% | -34.67% | 8.10%* | -20.27% |
| Dec | -13.70% | -35.12% | 66.54% | 202.47% | 394.96% | -- | 123.03% |
| Total | -13.70% | -85.45% | -91.47% | 45.18% | 30.97% | -68.97% | -30.57% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.13
SMA 50: $1.61
SMA 200: $2.59
Current: $1.16
EMA 12: $1.10
EMA 26: $1.27
MACD: -0.1662 | Signal: 0.0240
BEARISH
ADX (14): 43.96
STRONG TREND
+DI: 21.26
−DI: 30.78
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 41.71
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 39.59
Stoch %D: 23.55
Williams %R: -25.52
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.31
BB Lower: $0.95
NEUTRAL
OBV: 756,885,075
Vol SMA 20: 3,563,947
Vol ROC: 25.61%
ATR: $0.11
True Range: $0.24
HV 20: 93.9%
HV 30: 83.4%
HV 60: 68.3%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Written before SIDU’s Aug 14 earnings report, so it doesn’t reflect the results.
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis for SIDU:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Sidus Space's recent positive news headlines, including partnerships and product launches, have boosted investor sentiment.
Primary Risks: High volatility, potential regulatory issues, and competition in the space technology sector.
Investment Thesis: SIDU has potential for growth, but investors should be cautious due to high volatility and market fluctuations. Recent news sentiments impact is neutral, with a mix of positive and negative headlines.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a mixed impact on sentiment, with some positive articles offset by negative comments from short sellers. This has resulted in a neutral overall sentiment assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL; Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH; Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $4.47
- SMA 50: $4.06
- Upper Bollinger Band: $5.91
- Lower Bollinger Band: $3.04
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (46.14), not overbought or oversold. MACD signal: Bullish (0.05 / Signal: -0.14 / Histogram: 0.19) Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (not squeezed, but not breaking out)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 31204958.40
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 912164554.29
- Volume Rate of Change: -9.25%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Negative headline from short seller, calling SIDU's space stocks "Sci-Fi Wishes" (Benzinga, 2026-06-12)
- Positive article about Starfighters Space (FJET) joining the Russell 3000 (Benzinga, 2026-06-03)
- Mixed sentiment article discussing Micron and memory stocks (Benzinga, 2026-04-06)
- Positive article about potential ceasefire in space technology (Benzinga, 2026-04-01)
- Positive article about SIDU's break into the $151B Golden Dome Defense Buildout (Investing.com, 2025-12-25)
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (Mixed sentiment from recent news headlines)
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming earnings report
- Regulatory changes in space technology sector
Market Narrative: The market narrative is neutral, with a mix of positive and negative headlines. The technical analysis suggests a bearish trend in the short-term, but the long-term outlook remains bullish.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (beta >1.2), SIDU moves more than the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is high, with a historical volatility of 190.0%.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Medium (48.3%)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: Bullish sentiment (0.21)
- Market Expectation: Options market pricing $1.73 move by expiration
Downside Protection: Support levels: SMA 50 ($4.06), Lower Bollinger Band ($3.04)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
- SIDU is a space technology stock, which has performed relatively well in recent months.
- The sector is currently experiencing high volatility.
Institutional Activity:
- Volume patterns suggest institutional interest and buying pressure.
Correlation Analysis: RSquared: 0.20 (Sidus Space's price moves are not strongly correlated with the market)
Relative Valuation: SIDU's current price-to-earnings ratio is relatively low compared to its peers.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 50 ($4.06)
- Lower Bollinger Band ($3.04)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band ($5.91) - potential breakout level
- Support levels: SMA 20 ($4.47), SMA 50 ($4.06)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Upcoming earnings report
- Regulatory changes in space technology sector
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations will depend on the investor's risk tolerance and market conditions.
I hope this comprehensive analysis meets your requirements!
Generated
News
All SIDU news →
Earnings History
2 of 2 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
29.14%
Avg Actual Move
5.99%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | After-Close | 32.33% | 9.48% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2026-08-14 | After-Close | 25.96% | 2.50% | 0.10x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
SIDU Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $0.38
7-DTE Move: $0.28
Days to Exp: 39 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 1,226
Put Volume: 1,199
P/C Volume: 0.978
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 41,633
Put OI: 22,711
P/C OI: 0.546
Total OI: 64,344
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.28
ATM Put: $0.10
Call %: 23.8%
Put %: 8.7%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 2,425
Chain OI: 64,344
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 70th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
70%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.23
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.30
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.54
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt -0.30: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt +0.54: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 6 ATM contracts, 2k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$0.38Nov 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.2383
Alpha: 126.86%
Correlation: 0.2347
R-Squared: 5.5%
Stock Volatility: 189.9%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own SIDU
3 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $4.9M | #2105 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $3.3M | #1687 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $1.7M | #2654 of 3716 | +37.7% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SIDU Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 36 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 33,638,511 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
6 filers$6.47M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $4.01M | 61.90% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $939.95K | 14.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $743.53K | 11.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $360.24K | 5.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $345.35K | 5.33% | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $77.65K | 1.20% | 2026-09-30 |
8 filers$9.68M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.99M | 30.95% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Caption Management, LLC | $2.84M | 29.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.34M | 13.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $870.26K | 8.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | SABBY MANAGEMENT, LLC | $816.30K | 8.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $329.61K | 3.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $295.39K | 3.05% | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $192.76K | 1.99% | 2026-09-30 |
SIDU Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-10Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-10 | Tiffany Ann Norwood | Director | Exer (M) | +2,047 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Kelle B. Wendling | Director | Grant (A) | +17,241 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Jeffrey S Shuman | Director | Exer (M) | +16,621 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Lavanson Coffey | Director | Exer (M) | +7,124 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Leonardo Riera | Director | Exer (M) | +4,749 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Lavanson Coffey | Director | Exer (M) | +2,941 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | John Cole Oliver | Director | Exer (M) | +490 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Jeffrey S Shuman | Director | Exer (M) | +1,715 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Leonardo Riera | Director | Exer (M) | +7,206 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | John Cole Oliver | Director | Exer (M) | +6,975 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Jeffrey S Shuman | Director | Exer (M) | +8,823 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Leonardo Riera | Director | Exer (M) | +490 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Lavanson Coffey | Director | Exer (M) | +735 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Dana S Kilborne | Director | Exer (M) | +7,955 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Dana S Kilborne | Director | Exer (M) | +735 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
SIDU Insider Holdings
8 insiders · @ $1.16
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carol Marlene Craig | CEO | 140,000 | $161.7K | $115.5K | 2 | 2025-02-20 |
| 2 | Jeffrey S Shuman | Director | 47,307 | $54.6K | $24.7K | 5 | 2026-07-06 |
| 3 | Billy Joe White | CFO | 17,671 | $20.4K | $0 | 2 | 2024-12-19 |
| 4 | Leonardo Riera | Director | 13,916 | $16.1K | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-06 |
| 5 | Lavanson Coffey | Director | 13,006 | $15.0K | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-06 |
| 6 | Dana S Kilborne | Director | 8,690 | $10.0K | $0 | 3 | 2025-10-02 |
| 7 | John Cole Oliver | Director | 6,975 | $8.1K | $0 | 3 | 2025-10-02 |
| 8 | Tiffany Ann Norwood | Director | 2,047 | $2.4K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-10 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
SIDU Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 29, 2026Directors 8
- Carol Marlene Craig · since Dec 13, 2021
- Leonardo Riera · since Apr 5, 2023
- Jeffrey S Shuman · since Jul 8, 2024
- Lavanson Coffey · since Aug 27, 2024
- Tiffany Ann Norwood · since Jul 15, 2025
- Kelle B. Wendling · since Jan 1, 2026
- Larry G Swets Jr · since Oct 5, 2026
- Hassan Baqar · since Oct 28, 2026
Officers 1
- Alan Khalili · Chief Financial Officer · since Jul 22, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (22)
| Oct 28, 2026 | Hassan Baqar became a director |
| Oct 5, 2026 | Larry G Swets Jr became a director |
| Jul 22, 2026 | Alan Khalili became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jan 1, 2026 | The company announced the departure of John Cole Oliver from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 1, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Dana S Kilborne from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 1, 2026 | Kelle B. Wendling became a director |
| Jul 15, 2025 | Tiffany Ann Norwood became a director |
| Jan 14, 2025 | Adarsh Parekh became Chief Financial Officer |
| Aug 27, 2024 | Lavanson Coffey became a director |
| Jul 8, 2024 | Jeffrey S Shuman became a director |
| Feb 20, 2024 | Billy Joe White became CFO |
| Jan 18, 2024 | Richard J Berman became a director |
| May 18, 2023 | Carol Marlene Craig listed as CEO (previously Chairwoman & CEO) in SEC filings |
| Apr 5, 2023 | Leonardo Riera became a director |
| Apr 11, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Scott J Silverman as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Dec 16, 2021 | Miguel Valero became a director |
| Dec 16, 2021 | John Cole Oliver became a director |
| Dec 15, 2021 | Dana S Kilborne became a director |
| Dec 13, 2021 | Scott J Silverman became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 13, 2021 | Carol Marlene Craig became a director |
| Dec 13, 2021 | Carol Marlene Craig became a 10% owner |
| Dec 13, 2021 | Carol Marlene Craig became Chairwoman & CEO |
Not reported recently (4)
- Adarsh Parekh · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated May 2, 2025
- Billy Joe White · Last reported as CFO in an SEC filing dated Dec 19, 2024
- Richard J Berman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 30, 2024
- Miguel Valero · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 29, 2022
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-11-06
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-06 | Restatement (non-reliance) | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-29 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-09 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-06 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-29 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-24 | Director or officer change · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-21 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | Shareholder vote results | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-13 | 0001493152-26-037731 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
20 ETFs hold SIDU
20 shown · $14.62M total exposure · 0.00% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $5.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $2.6M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 3 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $2.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $1.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $952,019 | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 6 | UFO Procure Space ETF | Nport | 0.15% | $872,282 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 7 | VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $529,816 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 8 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $304,688 | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 9 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $201,945 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | Global X | 0.22% | $74,507 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 11 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.00% | $48,372 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 12 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $41,109 | $3.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 13 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $12,265 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | DIPR Corgi Space & Satellite Communications ETF | Corgi | 0.58% | $7,415 | $1.3M | 2026-11-06 |
| 15 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $5,974 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 16 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $5,739 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $4,451 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 18 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $3,030 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 19 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $126 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 20 | RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $35 | — | 2026-11-06 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-0.94
TTM Revenue
$3.50M
TTM Net Income
$-28.27M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-20.59M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $359.37K | $-5.21M | $-0.08 | $-5.65M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $586.30K | $-11.40M | $-0.31 | $-4.09M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $1.30M | $-6.03M | $-0.24 | $-6.22M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $1.26M | $-5.63M | $-0.31 | $-4.64M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $238.49K | $-6.41M | $-0.35 | $-3.21M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $825.96K | $-5.67M | $-0.38 | $-5.54M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $1.87M | $-3.90M | $-0.93 | $-2.72M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $927.57K | $-4.14M | $-0.99 | $-2.15M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $1.05M | $-3.85M | $-1.42 | $-5.42M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $1.34M | $-3.51M | $-2.19 | $-1.79M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $985.52K | $-4.08M | $-5.49 | $-3.82M |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $1.37M | $-3.50M | $-6.85 | $-2.65M |
Q1 2026 • period ending 2026-03-31 • filed 2026-05-15
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
0.81
P/S
10.89
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
3.09
ROE
-59.7%
ROA
-54.8%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-53.93%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$38.18M
as of 2026-11-09
SIDU vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECHO EchoStar Corporation | $27.5B | 3.7 | — | +0.6% | 71 |
| GSAT Globalstar, Inc. Common Stock | $10.9B | — | +5.9% | +34.2% | 22 |
| ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. Class A Common Sto | $9.7B | — | +2256.9% | −55.8% | 70 |
| VSAT Viasat Inc | $8.8B | — | +2.7% | +95.6% | 55 |
| IRDM Iridium Communications Inc. | $4.7B | 30.1 | +3.6% | +154.2% | 39 |
| TSAT Telesat Corporation Class A Common Share | $640M | — | — | +55.8% | 75 |
| GOGO Gogo Inc. | $526M | 37.1 | +58.8% | −22.0% | 50 |
| SPIR Spire Global, Inc. | $338M | — | −33.1% | +21.3% | 39 |
| SIDU Sidus Space, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $100M | — | −9.2% | −73.3% | 35 |
| Peer median | $6.7B | 30.1 | +4.8% | +27.8% | 52 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
19.91M
SI % of Float
19.72%
Days to Cover
4.59
Short Vol Ratio
48.0%
Free Float
101.00M
Float %
99.9%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06 • Float 2026-09-22