JBIO Jade Biosciences, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
15.13
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $8.36 – $28.00
- YTD
- +6.85%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 91.38
- Straddle Price
- $5.05
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.02
- Market Cap
- $0.9B
- Open
- $14.84
- Day Range
- $14.72 – $15.43
- Volume
- 931,929
- Prev Close
- $14.86
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.13 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.36% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.30% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +92.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -28.0% |
| Book / Price | 62.2% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $17.71 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $14.07 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 95.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 39.6× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 19.0× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $32.68 | 15% | median 3.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 3.8× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $17.71 | 62% | stability 82% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $14.50 | 23% | 12 strikes · skew +0.52 |
- Industry (SIC)
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.9B
- Employees
- 55
- List Date
- 2025-04-29
- CIK
- 0001798749
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12 (Pre-Market)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.73) (5 est.)
- Headquarters
- Waltham, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.jadebiosciences.com
Jade Biosciences Inc is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing therapies for autoimmune diseases. Its flagship candidate, JADE101, targets the cytokine APRIL and is in a Phase 1 clinical trial for the treatment of immunoglobulin A nephropathy. The company's pipeline also includes JADE201, an afucosylated anti-BAFF-R monoclonal antibody, and JADE301, an antibody candidate in preclinical development.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 10.24% | 10.24% |
| Feb | -- | -10.93% | -10.93% |
| Mar | -- | -0.50% | -0.50% |
| Apr | -6.31% | 52.31% | 23.00% |
| May | -27.50% | -13.17% | -20.34% |
| Jun | 38.75% | 19.53% | 29.14% |
| Jul | -33.70% | -8.86% | -21.28% |
| Aug | 14.66% | 11.54% | 13.10% |
| Sep | 13.25% | -33.16% | -9.95% |
| Oct | 7.57% | 9.88%* | 8.73% |
| Nov | 35.37% | -- | 35.37% |
| Dec | 27.52% | -- | 27.52% |
| Total | 50.67% | 15.31% | 32.99% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BULLISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key Drivers:
- Positive recent news headlines, particularly regarding the company's clinical trials and corporate appointments
- Technical indicators such as MACD and RSI indicating potential uptrend momentum
Primary Risks:
- High volatility relative to market, increasing risk of large price movements
- Options market pricing a significant move by expiration, potentially leading to increased volatility
Investment Thesis: JBIO has strong technical momentum and positive recent news sentiment, suggesting a potential long-term uptrend. However, the high volatility and options market pricing suggest caution is warranted.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent news headlines have been overwhelmingly positive, with the appointment of Mark Eisner, M.D., to the board of directors and positive interim phase 1 results for JADE101. These developments have likely contributed to the stock's upward momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - Uptrend; Medium-term (1-3 months) - Uptrend; Long-term (3-12 months) - Bullish Momentum
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $24.47
- Middle Bollinger Band: $22.06
- Lower Bollinger Band: $19.65
- 20-day SMA: $22.06
- 50-day SMA: $21.33
- 200-day SMA: $17.76
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 46.28 (neutral)
- MACD: 0.11 / Signal: -0.24 / Histogram: 0.35 (bullish momentum)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 764817.56
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 6228543.75
- Volume Rate of Change: -94.53%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The past week has seen a series of positive news headlines, including the appointment of Mark Eisner, M.D., to the board of directors and positive interim phase 1 results for JADE101.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is POSITIVE (70% positive, 30% neutral)
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming clinical trial data releases
- Regulatory approvals or setbacks
Market Narrative: The recent news headlines have been overwhelmingly positive, suggesting a potential long-term uptrend. However, the high volatility and options market pricing suggest caution is warranted.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment:
- Beta: 1.36 (vs SPY) - High risk relative to market
- Alpha: 0.98 - Above-average return relative to market
- Correlation: 0.24 - Low correlation with market, increasing risk
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are HIGH compared to historical norms.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 9.5% (Low) - shows if volatility is historically high/low
- Current IV: 115.1%
- Expected Move: $3.05 (21 DTE), 7-DTE: $3.05
- Volume Flow: 1 calls vs 100 puts
- Open Interest: 1 calls vs 224 puts
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 100.00 (Bearish sentiment)
- Put/Call OI Ratio: 224.00
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: $19.65 (Lower Bollinger Band) and $17.76 (200-day SMA)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
- Relative strength vs sector/market: JBIO is outperforming the market in the biotech sector.
Institutional Activity:
- Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: The recent increase in volume suggests institutional buying interest.
Correlation Analysis:
- How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): 0.24 - Low correlation with market, increasing risk
Relative Valuation:
- Position within trading range: JBIO is currently trading near the upper end of its recent trading range, suggesting potential for a pullback or consolidation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support levels: $19.65 (Lower Bollinger Band) and $17.76 (200-day SMA)
- Resistance levels: $24.47 (Upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout level: $25.00 (Above Upper Bollinger Band)
- Breakdown level: $18.00 (Below Lower Bollinger Band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Upcoming clinical trial data releases
- Regulatory approvals or setbacks
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: $20.50 and $19.90
- Position sizing considerations: 5-10% of portfolio size
Please note that this report is based on the provided data and should not be considered investment advice. It is essential to evaluate the risks and potential rewards associated with any stock or investment before making a decision.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-01 | Pre-Market | 60.26% | 5.26% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-08-13 | After-Close | 136.43% | 7.64% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2025-11-14 | After-Close | 31.31% | 17.66% | 0.56x | Within |
| 2026-01-05 | After-Close | 22.87% | 0.38% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-03-06 | After-Close | 34.88% | 2.70% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2026-05-08 | After-Close | 16.18% | 3.68% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2026-08-10 | Pre-Market | 22.31% | 1.05% | 0.05x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
JBIO Options Activity & IV Rank
JBIO IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 9th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $20.7M | #1129 of 6285 | +577.3% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $7.0M | #1833 of 3716 | +96.5% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $3.7M | #1082 of 1945 | -36.7% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $1.6M | #2078 of 3138 | -45.5% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
JBIO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $797.70K | 99.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $4.44K | 0.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.52M | 78.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $415.51K | 21.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Persistent Asset Partners Ltd | $8.86K | 0.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | DIADEMA PARTNERS LP | $3.17K | 0.16% | 2026-06-30 |
JBIO Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-26| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-26 | Mark Eisner | Director | Grant (A) | +47,675 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Christopher W. Cain | Director | Grant (A) | +34,843 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Lawrence Otto Klein | Director | Grant (A) | +34,843 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Erin Lavelle | Director | Grant (A) | +34,843 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Eric Dobmeier | Director | Grant (A) | +34,843 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Fairmount Funds Management LLC | Director | Grant (A) | +174,215 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-13 | Elizabeth Balta | See Remarks | Award (A) | +28,125 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-13 | Andrew James King | See Remarks | Award (A) | +41,250 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-13 | Tom Frohlich | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +78,750 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-13 | Bradford D. Dahms | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +37,813 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-08 | Fairmount Healthcare Co-Invest IV L.P. | Director | Award (A) | +6,665,630 | $9.14 | $60.92M | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-14 | Bradford D. Dahms | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +526,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-19 | Tom Frohlich | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +6,000 | $7.40 | $44.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | Erin Lavelle | Director | Grant (A) | +23,017 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-01 | Eric Dobmeier | Director | Grant (A) | +23,017 opt | — | EDGAR |
JBIO Insider Holdings
6 insiders · @ $15.13| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fairmount Healthcare Co-Invest IV L.P. | Director | 1,897,677 | $28.71M | $0 | 1 | 2025-10-08 |
| 2 | Andrew James King | See Remarks | 386,113 | $5.84M | $0 | 1 | 2026-02-13 |
| 3 | Tom Frohlich | Chief Executive Officer | 86,331 | $1.31M | $44.4K | 2 | 2026-02-13 |
| 4 | Bradford D. Dahms | Chief Financial Officer | 37,813 | $572.1K | $0 | 2 | 2026-02-13 |
| 5 | Peter Kolchinsky | 10%+ Owner | 28,206 | $426.8K | $0 | 1 | 2025-04-30 |
| 6 | Elizabeth Balta | See Remarks | 28,125 | $425.5K | $0 | 1 | 2026-02-13 |
JBIO Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 26, 2026Directors 11
- Christopher W. Cain · since Apr 28, 2025
- Eric Dobmeier · since Apr 28, 2025
- Erin Lavelle · since Apr 28, 2025
- Fairmount Funds Management LLC (entity) · since Apr 28, 2025
- Fairmount Healthcare Fund II L.P. (entity) · since Apr 28, 2025
- Lawrence Otto Klein · since Apr 28, 2025
- Peter Evan Harwin · since Apr 28, 2025
- Tom Frohlich · since Apr 28, 2025
- Tomas Kiselak · since Apr 28, 2025
- Fairmount Healthcare Co-Invest IV L.P. (entity) · on file since Oct 2025
- Mark Eisner · since Jun 25, 2026
Officers 5
- Tom Frohlich · Chief Executive Officer · since Apr 28, 2025
- Bradford D. Dahms · Chief Financial Officer · since Jul 14, 2025
- Andrew James King · Chief Scientific Officer & Head of Research and Development · since Apr 28, 2025
- Elizabeth Balta · Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary · since Apr 28, 2025
- Jonathan Quick · since Apr 28, 2025
10% owners 5
- Fairmount Funds Management LLC (entity) · since Apr 28, 2025
- Fairmount Healthcare Co-Invest IV L.P. (entity) · on file since Oct 2025
- Fairmount Healthcare Fund II L.P. (entity) · since Apr 28, 2025
- Peter Evan Harwin · since Apr 28, 2025
- Tomas Kiselak · since Apr 28, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (84)
| Jun 25, 2026 | Mark Eisner became a director |
| Oct 8, 2025 | Fairmount Healthcare Co-Invest IV L.P. first on file as a director |
| Oct 8, 2025 | Fairmount Healthcare Co-Invest IV L.P. first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 14, 2025 | Bradford D. Dahms became Chief Financial Officer |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Rajeev M. Shah reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Rajeev M. Shah reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Ra Capital Management, L.p. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Ra Capital Management, L.p. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 30, 2025 | RA Capital Healthcare Fund LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Apr 30, 2025 | RA Capital Healthcare Fund LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Peter Kolchinsky reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Peter Kolchinsky reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Tomas Kiselak became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Tomas Kiselak became a 10% owner |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Tom Frohlich became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Tom Frohlich became Chief Executive Officer |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Timothy P Noyes from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Timothy P Noyes as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Mark T Iwicki from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Joshua Resnick from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Hetal Kocinsky as Chief Medical Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Habib J Dable from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Donald J Santel from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of David S. Grayzel from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Allison Dorval from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Peter Evan Harwin became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Peter Evan Harwin became a 10% owner |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Lawrence Otto Klein became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Jonathan Quick became an officer |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Hetal Kocinsky became Chief Medical Officer |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Fairmount Healthcare Fund II L.P. became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Fairmount Healthcare Fund II L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Fairmount Funds Management LLC became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Fairmount Funds Management LLC became a 10% owner |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Erin Lavelle became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Eric Dobmeier became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Elizabeth Balta became Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Christopher W. Cain became a director |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Andrew James King became Chief Scientific Officer & Head of Research and Development |
| Oct 6, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Maha Katabi from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 20, 2024 | Marinus Verwijs listed as Chief Technical Officer (previously Chief Technology Officer) in SEC filings |
| Nov 3, 2023 | Marinus Verwijs listed as Chief Technology Officer (previously Senior Vice President, Cmc) in SEC filings |
| Jul 10, 2023 | Habib J Dable became a director |
| Mar 7, 2023 | Timothy Pigot became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Jan 19, 2023 | Donald J Santel became a director |
| Aug 19, 2022 | Ralph Niven listed as Chief Scientific Officer (previously Chief Development Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jul 19, 2022 | Atlas Venture Fund XII, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 22, 2022 | RA Capital Nexus Fund, L.P. first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Mar 21, 2022 | Marinus Verwijs became Senior Vice President, Cmc |
| Jul 15, 2021 | Allison Dorval became a director |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Cormorant Private Healthcare Fund II, LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Cormorant Global Healthcare Master Fund, LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Cormorant Asset Management, LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Bihua Chen reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Timothy P Noyes became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Timothy P Noyes became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Sofinnova Venture Partners X, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Sofinnova Management X, L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Ralph Niven became Chief Development Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Rajeev M. Shah became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Rajeev M. Shah became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Ra Capital Management, L.p. became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Ra Capital Management, L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | RA Capital Nexus Fund, L.P. became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | RA Capital Healthcare Fund LP became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | RA Capital Healthcare Fund LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Peter Kolchinsky became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Peter Kolchinsky became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Mark T Iwicki became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Maha Katabi became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Maha Katabi became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Joshua Resnick became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | James Healy became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Hunter Gillies became Chief Medical Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | George A Eldridge became Officer Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | David S. Grayzel became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Cormorant Private Healthcare Fund II, LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Cormorant Global Healthcare Master Fund, LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Cormorant Asset Management, LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Bihua Chen became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Benjamin T Dake became Officer Title: President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Atlas Venture Fund XII, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Atlas Venture Associates XII, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Atlas Venture Associates XII, L.P. became a 10% owner |
- Prev
- 1
- …
Not reported recently (13)
- Benjamin T Dake · Last reported as Officer Title: President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary in an SEC filing dated Aug 2, 2024
- RA Capital Nexus Fund, L.P. · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 20, 2024
- Hunter Gillies · Last reported as Chief Medical Officer in an SEC filing dated Jun 14, 2024
- George A Eldridge · Last reported as Officer Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in an SEC filing dated Jun 14, 2024
- Marinus Verwijs · Last reported as Chief Technical Officer in an SEC filing dated Jun 14, 2024
- Maha Katabi · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jun 7, 2024
- Ralph Niven · Last reported as Chief Scientific Officer in an SEC filing dated Feb 7, 2024
- Timothy Pigot · Last reported as Chief Commercial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 24, 2024
- Atlas Venture Associates XII, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 6, 2021
- Atlas Venture Associates XII, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 6, 2021
- James Healy · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 6, 2021
- Sofinnova Management X, L.L.C. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 6, 2021
- Sofinnova Venture Partners X, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 6, 2021
JBIO Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-06-25What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-25 | Atlas Venture Fund XII, L.P. | Shareholder | 28,977 | $303.7K | 2025-06-25 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-25 | Atlas Venture Associates XII, L.P. | Shareholder | 235 | $2.5K | 2025-06-25 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-24 | Atlas Venture Fund XII, L.P. | Shareholder | 16,132 | $159.2K | 2025-06-24 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-24 | Atlas Venture Associates XII, L.P. | Shareholder | 131 | $1.3K | 2025-06-24 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-06 | Atlas Venture Associates XII, L.P. | Shareholder | 48 | $552 | 2025-05-06 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-06 | Atlas Venture Fund XII, L.P. | Shareholder | 5,883 | $67.7K | 2025-05-06 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-06-14 | MARINUS VERWIJS | Officer | 10,600 | $265.0K | 2024-06-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-06-13 | HUNTER C GILLIES | Officer | 6,000 | $147.0K | 2024-06-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-17 | HUNTER C GILLIES | Officer | 4,000 | $84.3K | 2024-05-17 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-16 | TIMOTHY NOYES | Officer, Director | 10,000 | $215.8K | 2024-05-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XBI State Street® SPDR® S&P® Biotech ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.26% | $26.6M | $10.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $23.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $15.0M | $75.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 4 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $8.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $5.5M | $13.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 6 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $3.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | Nport | 0.12% | $1.8M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 8 | VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $1.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.15% | $1.8M | $1.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 10 | VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | Vanguard | 0.09% | $1.6M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 11 | LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF | Direxion | 0.17% | $1.1M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 12 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.1M | $97.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 13 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $614,491 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $501,778 | $10.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.04% | $440,629 | $1.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | BBC Virtus Biotech Clinical Trials Etf | Nport | 0.86% | $400,155 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 17 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.01% | $330,397 | $3.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 18 | FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.01% | $312,996 | $3.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 19 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.02% | $292,463 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $225,144 | $20.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | Fidelity | 0.29% | $148,600 | $51.7M | 2026-10-20 |
| 22 | MSSM Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $72,272 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 23 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $54,107 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 24 | ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $46,472 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 25 | OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $40,313 | — | 2026-05-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (4 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | — | $-46.21M | $-0.76 | $-43.66M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | — | $-33.13M | $-0.57 | $-24.08M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | — | $-19.09M | $-0.48 | $-22.12M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | — | $-24.55M | $-0.86 | $-20.16M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.