GDV The Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust
XNYSStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $2.5B
- List Date
- 2003-11-25
- CIK
- 0001260729
- Homepage
- https://www.gabelli.com
Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust operates as a diversified closed-end management investment company. The fund's investment objective is to provide a high level of total return on its assets with an emphasis on dividends and income. To achieve its objective, the fund may invest its assets in dividend-paying securities or other income-producing securities. The fund invests in various sectors, including Financial Services, Food and Beverage, Health Care, Consumer Products, Electronics, and Computer Software & Services, and others.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $2.5B shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $2.4M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Nov 25, 2003 NYSE
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (74% of its variance, beta 0.86); Developed markets ex-US over US (4% of its variance, beta 0.25). These factors explain 73% of its daily moves over the last year.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHDSchwab US Dividend Equity ETF | — | 0.06% | $115.9B | +28.4% | compare |
| SDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | — | 0.35% | $21.7B | +11.3% | compare |
| FVDFirst Trust Value Line Dividend Fund | — | 0.62% | $7.9B | +7.5% | compare |
| DLNWisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | — | 0.28% | $6.3B | +14.9% | compare |
| DONWisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund | — | 0.38% | $3.9B | +9.6% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Dividend category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.94% | -6.41% | 6.05% | -0.23% | 3.44% | 2.23% | 1.17% |
| Feb | 3.70% | -6.45% | -3.17% | 2.45% | -0.16% | 1.16% | -0.41% |
| Mar | 3.72% | 4.19% | -2.21% | 2.68% | -1.87% | -7.20% | -0.11% |
| Apr | 4.53% | -9.73% | 0.24% | -4.73% | -2.57% | 6.97% | -0.88% |
| May | 3.00% | 0.54% | -5.79% | 4.06% | 4.63% | -0.58% | 0.98% |
| Jun | -0.08% | -8.21% | 5.39% | 1.20% | 4.63% | 0.72% | 0.61% |
| Jul | -0.72% | 7.89% | 2.73% | 3.84% | 0.30% | 1.05% | 2.52% |
| Aug | 2.58% | -4.89% | -3.96% | 3.13% | 4.42% | 0.57% | 0.31% |
| Sep | -4.73% | -11.74% | -7.30% | 2.64% | 0.86% | -5.45% | -4.29% |
| Oct | 2.26% | 6.82% | -3.83% | -0.66% | -0.59% | 1.01%* | 0.83% |
| Nov | -4.20% | 6.92% | 7.86% | 6.40% | 1.44% | -- | 3.68% |
| Dec | 5.88% | -5.98% | 5.51% | -5.59% | 2.06% | -- | 0.38% |
| Total | 18.71% | -26.09% | 0.04% | 15.50% | 17.52% | -0.23% | 4.24% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
GDV Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $3.8M | #1097 of 4729 | -5.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
GDV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
GDV Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | Michael J Melarkey | Director | Buy (P) | +2,000 | $28.52 | $57.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Salvatore J Zizza | Director | Buy (P) | +500 | $28.57 | $14.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | Anthonie C Vanekris | Director | Sell (S) | −1,700 | $29.15 | -$49.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | Buy (P) | +4,500 | $29.09 | $130.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-10 | Anthony S. Colavita | Director | Buy (P) | +684 | $29.20 | $20.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-28 | James P Conn | Director | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $28.73 | $28.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-28 | Elizabeth C Bogan | Director | Buy (P) | +400 | $28.73 | $11.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-28 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | Buy (P) | +5,500 | $28.72 | $157.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-31 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | Buy (P) | +5,818,500 | $10.00 | $58.19M | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-02 | Anthonie C Vanekris | Director | Sell (S) | −920 | $26.82 | -$24.7K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-20 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $26.49 | $132.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-14 | Susan Watson Laughlin | Director | Buy (P) | +300 | $24.96 | $7.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-22 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | Buy (P) | +2,300 | $24.83 | $57.1K | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-18 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | Buy (P) | +200 | $24.94 | $5.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-18 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | Buy (P) | +8,411,500 | $10.00 | $84.11M | EDGAR |
GDV Insider Holdings
7 insiders · @ $28.46| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mario J Gabelli | Director | 170,812 | $4.86M | $160.80M | 79 | 2026-02-18 |
| 2 | Michael J Melarkey | Director | 7,951 | $226.3K | $57.0K | 2 | 2026-07-02 |
| 3 | Salvatore J Zizza | Director | 3,086 | $87.8K | $14.3K | 3 | 2026-07-01 |
| 4 | Susan Watson Laughlin | Director | 2,206 | $62.8K | $39.5K | 4 | 2025-02-14 |
| 5 | James P Conn | Director | 1,000 | $28.5K | -$75.3K | 2 | 2026-01-28 |
| 6 | Anthony S. Colavita | Director | 684 | $19.5K | $20.0K | 1 | 2026-02-10 |
| 7 | Elizabeth C Bogan | Director | 400 | $11.4K | $11.5K | 1 | 2026-01-28 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.