QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
ETF 116.36 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $101.05 – $121.01
- YTD
- +1.71%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 42.64
- Straddle Price
- $2.00
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.00
- Open
- $116.38
- Day Range
- $115.84 – $117.01
- Volume
- 208,297
- Prev Close
- $117.62
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2018-09-10
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 0.29% prospectus, filed Dec 29, 2025
- Assets
- $1.9B shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 0.20% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $7.4M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 189 top 10 are 29.8%
- Listed
- Sep 10, 2018 NYSE Arca
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (74% of its variance, beta 1.05); Value over growth (7% of its variance, beta -0.11); Small caps over large (5% of its variance, beta 0.24). These factors explain 84% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The fund seeks to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index (Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 189 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Quality ETFs
- May 2026
- −$42M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$104M −4.7% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$337M +15.2% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | −$42M |
| Apr 2026 | +$7.7M |
| Mar 2026 | −$70M |
| Feb 2026 | +$3.9M |
| Jan 2026 | +$27M |
| Dec 2025 | +$118M |
| Nov 2025 | +$22M |
| Oct 2025 | +$57M |
| Sep 2025 | −$56M |
| Aug 2025 | +$152M |
| Jul 2025 | +$123M |
| Jun 2025 | −$6.5M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 81 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF | 43% | 0.55% | $2.6B | +21.8% | compare |
| VUSEVident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 43% | 0.50% | $680M | +10.5% | compare |
| RWLCRayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF | 41% | 0.32% | $97M | — | compare |
| AVUQAvantis U.S. Quality ETF | 41% | 0.15% | $419M | +12.7% | compare |
| AFGRFirst Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF | 40% | 0.65% | $89M | — | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +8.5% 38% under, 24% over · 100% covered
- Price / earnings
- 24.1 1% loss-making · 99% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 8.4 · 3.6 revenue growth +14.9%
- Above 200-day average
- 70% 55% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 3.6% of float, weighted · 3.1 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 1% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 80% net selling
- 13F holders
- +0.4% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 48.0% of weight in 7 days; 72.2% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease | GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.99% | 0.32% | −92.0% |
| Increase | AAPLApple Inc | 1.27% | 3.90% | +218.6% |
| Increase | MCKMcKesson Corp | 0.15% | 2.22% | +2348.1% |
| Increase | COSTCostco Wholesale Corp | 0.14% | 2.07% | +1841.1% |
| Decrease | GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 1.81% | 0.10% | −92.7% |
| Decrease | NOWServiceNow Inc | 1.92% | 0.28% | −84.5% |
| Increase | GLWCorning Inc | 0.23% | 1.86% | +717.6% |
| Increase | GEVGE Vernova Inc | 0.19% | 1.77% | +930.4% |
| Decrease | BKNGBooking Holdings Inc | 2.77% | 1.19% | −46.7% |
| Decrease | APHAmphenol Corp | 3.86% | 2.33% | −27.5% |
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-10 | $0.0612 | CD |
| 2026-06-09 | 2026-06-11 | $0.0626 | CD |
| 2026-03-10 | 2026-03-12 | $0.0264 | CD |
| 2025-12-16 | 2025-12-18 | $0.0846 | CD |
| 2025-09-23 | 2025-09-25 | $0.0406 | CD |
| 2025-06-24 | 2025-06-26 | $0.0737 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 3.90% | Equity (common) | US |
| TJX | TJX Cos Inc/The | 3.23% | Equity (common) | US |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 3.15% | Equity (common) | US |
| MA | Mastercard Inc | 3.10% | Equity (common) | US |
| NFLX | Netflix Inc | 3.10% | Equity (common) | US |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 3.07% | Equity (common) | US |
| KLAC | KLA Corp | 3.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| ANET | Arista Networks Inc | 2.84% | Equity (common) | US |
| APP | AppLovin Corp | 2.77% | Equity (common) | US |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc | 2.73% | Equity (common) | US |
| LLY | Eli Lilly & Co | 2.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| APH | Amphenol Corp | 2.33% | Equity (common) | US |
| RL | Ralph Lauren Corp | 2.23% | Equity (common) | US |
| MCK | McKesson Corp | 2.22% | Equity (common) | US |
| COST | Costco Wholesale Corp | 2.07% | Equity (common) | US |
| GE | General Electric Co | 2.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| GLW | Corning Inc | 1.86% | Equity (common) | US |
| HWM | Howmet Aerospace Inc | 1.83% | Equity (common) | US |
| GEV | GE Vernova Inc | 1.77% | Equity (common) | US |
| MPWR | Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 1.69% | Equity (common) | US |
| SPOT | Spotify Technology SA | 1.63% | Equity (common) | SE |
| VRT | Vertiv Holdings Co | 1.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| ISRG | Intuitive Surgical Inc | 1.54% | Equity (common) | US |
| FIX | Comfort Systems USA Inc | 1.52% | Equity (common) | US |
| NYT | New York Times Co/The | 1.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc | 1.50% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRM | salesforce.com Inc | 1.20% | Equity (common) | US |
| BKNG | Booking Holdings Inc | 1.19% | Equity (common) | US |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 1.12% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADBE | Adobe Inc | 1.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| DXCM | Dexcom Inc | 1.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| PEN | Penumbra Inc | 0.94% | Equity (common) | US |
| ACN | Accenture PLC | 0.87% | Equity (common) | IE |
| PODD | Insulet Corp | 0.78% | Equity (common) | US |
| EVR | Evercore Inc | 0.68% | Equity (common) | US |
| INCY | Incyte Corp | 0.64% | Equity (common) | US |
| NTNX | Nutanix Inc | 0.64% | Equity (common) | US |
| UBER | Uber Technologies Inc | 0.60% | Equity (common) | US |
| MNST | Monster Beverage Corp | 0.59% | Equity (common) | US |
| JLL | Jones Lang LaSalle Inc | 0.59% | Equity (common) | US |
| EXEL | Exelixis Inc | 0.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| ROST | Ross Stores Inc | 0.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 0.57% | Equity (common) | US |
| EXPE | Expedia Group Inc | 0.56% | Equity (common) | US |
| CNX | CNX Resources Corp | 0.52% | Equity (common) | US |
| TPR | Tapestry Inc | 0.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| HUBS | HubSpot Inc | 0.44% | Equity (common) | US |
| WDC | Western Digital Corp | 0.44% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRS | Carpenter Technology Corp | 0.41% | Equity (common) | US |
| ALAB | Astera Labs Inc | 0.40% | Equity (common) | US |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.55% | -10.60% | 8.99% | 4.69% | 5.40% | -1.56% | 1.41% |
| Feb | -0.16% | -3.40% | -3.14% | 3.70% | -3.16% | -1.83% | -1.33% |
| Mar | -0.41% | 3.36% | 4.35% | 1.80% | -6.65% | -5.46% | -0.50% |
| Apr | 2.55% | -9.12% | -0.33% | -5.93% | 3.16% | 5.76% | -0.65% |
| May | 0.10% | -1.72% | 0.47% | 4.98% | 7.22% | 3.73% | 2.46% |
| Jun | 5.32% | -8.42% | 6.24% | 3.44% | 3.70% | 0.22% | 1.75% |
| Jul | 3.95% | 11.71% | 2.49% | 0.00% | 1.48% | -2.79% | 2.81% |
| Aug | 3.17% | -3.49% | -0.38% | 5.64% | 2.69% | 2.16% | 1.63% |
| Sep | -6.05% | -7.94% | -4.40% | 4.98% | 4.18% | 0.27% | -1.49% |
| Oct | 7.13% | 4.25% | -2.77% | 1.22% | 0.71% | -1.32%* | 1.54% |
| Nov | -1.88% | 5.51% | 8.91% | 12.36% | -1.88% | -- | 4.60% |
| Dec | 3.92% | -7.80% | 4.33% | -3.78% | 0.93% | -- | -0.48% |
| Total | 20.15% | -26.51% | 26.38% | 37.01% | 18.34% | -1.30% | 12.35% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report based on the provided data:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10)
Key Drivers: Strong technical signals, positive news sentiment, high volatility, and moderate beta.
Primary Risks: Overbought conditions in Bollinger Bands, potential mean reversion, and market uncertainties.
2-3 sentence investment thesis:
QGRO's recent price action is driven by a combination of positive fundamental data, strong technical signals, and optimistic news sentiment. While the stock has reached overbought levels, its beta suggests it may still amplify market movements, making it an attractive option for traders seeking moderate returns with relatively low risk.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent headlines have been largely positive, highlighting QGRO's quality growth ETF characteristics and sector performance. This sentiment is reflected in the options market, where the put/call ratio indicates a bullish bias.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) and Medium-term (1-3 months) are bullish; Long-term (3-12 months) is neutral.
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $112.60
- SMA 50: $110.49
- SMA 200: $112.32
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (64.64)
- MACD signal: Bullish
- Bollinger Bands position: Overbought
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 112318.95; On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1763541.51; Volume Rate of Change: -98.34%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The headlines highlight QGRO's quality growth ETF characteristics, sector performance, and market commentary.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive news sentiment with a neutral-to-bullish bias.
Catalyst Identification:
- No specific upcoming events or regulatory changes
Market Narrative:
The positive news sentiment supports the bullish technical signals, indicating that QGRO is likely to continue its upward momentum in the short term.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Above average volatility (beta = 1.14) with moderate risk relative to market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are higher than historical norms.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: Medium
- Put/call ratios: Bullish bias
- Unusual activity: None
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations based on SMA 20, SMA 50, and Bollinger Bands.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: QGRO's sector is performing well within its market category.
Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest with an increasing volume trend.
Correlation Analysis:
- R-squared interpretation: QGRO's price movements are strongly correlated with the overall market (0.89).
Relative Valuation: QGRO is trading near its mean reversion level, suggesting a potential reversal in the short term.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $112.60
- SMA 50: $110.49
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Bollinger Bands upper band: $114.79 (potential resistance)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None
Risk Management: Monitor SMA 20 and SMA 50 levels for potential mean reversion signals.
I hope this analysis meets the requirements! Let me know if you'd like me to revise anything or provide further insights.
QGRO Options Activity & IV Rank
QGRO IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
QGRO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $236.10K | 52.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $212.49K | 47.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $94.44K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|