NMZ Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
XNYSStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.9B
- List Date
- 2003-11-20
- CIK
- 0001266585
- Homepage
- https://www.nuveen.com
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opp Fund is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund's primary investment objective is to provide high current income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Fund's secondary investment objective is to seek an attractive total return consistent with its primary objective.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $1.9B shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $14M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Nov 20, 2003 NYSE
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (8% of its variance, beta 0.23); Long Treasuries (8% of its variance, beta 0.27). These factors explain 21% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYDVanEck High Yield Muni ETF | — | 0.32% | $4.4B | −4.5% | compare |
| HYMBState Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | — | 0.35% | $3.8B | −6.5% | compare |
| HIMUiShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | — | 0.39% | $2.6B | −6.2% | compare |
| BMOPBNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF | — | 0.54% | $1.8B | — | compare |
| FMHIFirst Trust Municipal High Income ETF | — | 0.70% | $1.0B | −5.9% | compare |
The largest other funds in the High Yield Muni category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.48% | -5.89% | 4.56% | 0.40% | 2.47% | 2.16% | 0.86% |
| Feb | -2.01% | -3.51% | -7.50% | 3.27% | 0.72% | 1.81% | -1.20% |
| Mar | 1.12% | -6.34% | 5.88% | 0.19% | -3.28% | -3.08% | -0.92% |
| Apr | 2.56% | -7.00% | 0.09% | -1.53% | -3.39% | -1.55% | -1.80% |
| May | 0.94% | 2.72% | -1.60% | -0.29% | -1.89% | 1.28% | 0.19% |
| Jun | 1.99% | -7.51% | -0.28% | 4.25% | -0.29% | 3.02% | 0.20% |
| Jul | -0.26% | 3.52% | -1.49% | -0.92% | -5.16% | -3.38% | -1.28% |
| Aug | -0.52% | -4.83% | -4.82% | 6.22% | 0.60% | -1.77% | -0.85% |
| Sep | -3.84% | -11.30% | -8.21% | 1.13% | 5.27% | -9.40% | -4.39% |
| Oct | -0.14% | -4.65% | -7.10% | -5.03% | 0.19% | 1.35%* | -2.56% |
| Nov | 0.75% | 12.96% | 12.87% | 3.99% | -0.09% | -- | 6.10% |
| Dec | 1.61% | -6.09% | -0.60% | -6.41% | -3.87% | -- | -3.07% |
| Total | 3.55% | -33.58% | -9.78% | 4.60% | -8.82% | -9.76% | -8.96% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for NMZ:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10) Key drivers: Stable volatility, range-bound technical signals, and neutral news sentiment Primary risks: Limited upside potential due to lack of clear catalysts, high possibility of mean reversion from oversold levels Investment thesis: NMZ is a stable and low-volatility stock with limited growth potential in the short term. It may be suitable for conservative investors seeking steady returns. Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral news headlines do not have a significant impact on the analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Range-bound, potentially mean-reverting from oversold levels
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Uptrend, supported by SMA 50 and EMA 12
- Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral, with no clear trend direction
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper: $10.34 (Bollinger Band upper)
- Middle: $10.23 (SMA 20)
- Lower: $10.12 (Bollinger Band lower)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (43.28), potential buy signal
- MACD signal: Bearish, with no clear crossover
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, with no clear breakout or mean reversion
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: Increasing volume suggests support for the current price level
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): Negative OBV indicates selling pressure
- Volume Rate of Change: Decreasing volume rate of change suggests waning institutional interest
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines do not have a significant impact on the analysis.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregated sentiment is NEUTRAL, with no clear bias towards bullish or bearish signals.
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts identified that could significantly impact the stock's price.
Market Narrative: The neutral market narrative does not contradict technical signals, but rather suggests a lack of clear direction.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment: Beta: 0.24 (low volatility), alpha -0.03 (neutral performance)
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Low volatility, with no significant changes in recent periods
Options Market Signals: IV rank: N/A (no options data available) Put/call ratios: N/A (no options data available) Unusual activity: N/A (no options data available)
Downside Protection: Support levels: $10.12 (Bollinger Band lower), SMA 20 ($10.23), EMA 12 ($10.24)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral, with no clear trend direction
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: Decreasing volume rate of change suggests waning interest.
Correlation Analysis: How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): Low correlation, with NMZ moving independently of the broader market.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Neutral, with no clear directional bias.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $10.12 (Bollinger Band lower), SMA 20 ($10.23), EMA 12 ($10.24)
- Resistance: $10.34 (Bollinger Band upper)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout level: N/A (no clear breakout levels identified)
- Breakdown level: N/A (no clear breakdown levels identified)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts identified that could significantly impact the stock's price.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels: $9.90 (10% below current price), position sizing considerations: Conservative investors may consider reducing their exposure due to limited upside potential and waning institutional interest.
Note: The analysis is based on the provided data and should not be taken as investment advice. It is essential to review and verify the accuracy of the data before making any investment decisions.
NMZ Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $6.3M | #873 of 4729 | +351.2% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
NMZ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
NMZ Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-06| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.22 | -$0 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.22 | -$0 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.24 | -$4 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.21 | $1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Albin F Moschner | Sell (S) | −2,912 | $10.36 | -$30.2K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-29 | Wells Fargo Municipal Capital Strategies, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | +9,008 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-06 | William A Siffermann | Vice President | Buy (P) | +100 | $10.48 | $1.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-22 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.43 | -$442 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-15 | Banc of America Preferred Funding Corp | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | 2,000 (reclass) | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-14 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.60 | -$966 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-10 | MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.62 | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-19 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.60 | $1.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-24 | William A Siffermann | Vice President | Buy (P) | +300 | $11.07 | $3.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-17 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $10.87 | -$2 | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-13 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | +15,150 | $13.76 | $206.8K | EDGAR |
NMZ Insider Holdings
5 insiders · @ $9.03| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albin F Moschner | 4,524 | $40.8K | $39.2K | 3 | 2026-06-29 | |
| 2 | Wells Fargo Municipal Capital Strategies, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 4,504 | $40.6K | $0 | 1 | 2026-04-29 |
| 3 | William A Siffermann | Vice President | 913 | $8.2K | $6.1K | 3 | 2026-03-06 |
| 4 | Banc of America Preferred Funding Corp | 10%+ Owner | 870 | $7.9K | $0 | 4 | 2025-12-15 |
| 5 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | 21 | $190 | $214.7K | 9 | 2026-08-04 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.