SHAZ SharonAI Holdings, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
26.60
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
SHAZ
$26.60
—
Key stats
$26.60
- 52-Week Range
- $16.55 – $97.48
- YTD
- -16.09%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 46.41
- Straddle Price
- $8.05
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.33
- Market Cap
- $1.1B
- Open
- $30.80
- Day Range
- $26.43 – $31.50
- Volume
- 2,527,067
- Prev Close
- $31.03
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.21% |
| Beta vs SPY | 2.86 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 20.93% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.77% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +72.0pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -39.9% |
| Book / Price | 333.5% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.90 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $54.52 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $48.11 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 167.9% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.9B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: ADP, APLD, HNGE, PEGA, QBTS, RDDT, RNG, TOST, VRSK, WDAY
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$211.19
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 34.2× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 28.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $886.81 | 22% | median 8.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $1.51 | 22% | median 6.1× · 10 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $54.52 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $29.48 | 56% | 26 strikes · skew +0.31 |
As of 2026-10-16 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROCESSING & DATA PREPARATION (7374) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.1B
- Employees
- 30
- List Date
- 2025-12-18
- CIK
- 0002068385
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-05
- EPS Forecast
- ($1.47) (3 est.)
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.sharonai.com
SharonAI Holdings Inc is a neocloud operator, purpose-built to power the next generation of artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC). The Company's infrastructure is architected from the ground up to meet the specific, intensive, and complex demands of modern AI training and inference workloads, machine learning, and Generative AI. Its services include: Sovereign AI Australia, GPU-as-a-Service, SHARON AI Cloud, SHARON AI Private Cloud, Virtual Private Clusters, HPC Servers, and SHARON AI Studio. The company's products are: SHARON AI Supercluster, GPU Fleet, Virtual Ser…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -21.70% | -21.70% |
| Mar | -- | 10.88% | 10.88% |
| Apr | -- | 66.55% | 66.55% |
| May | -- | 79.65% | 79.65% |
| Jun | -- | 6.42% | 6.42% |
| Jul | -- | -40.31% | -40.31% |
| Aug | -- | 4.73% | 4.73% |
| Sep | -- | 3.72% | 3.72% |
| Oct | -- | -46.66%* | -46.66% |
| Nov | -- | -- | -- |
| Dec | -2.63% | -- | -2.63% |
| Total | -2.63% | -4.39% | -3.51% |
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $46.56
SMA 50: $54.01
SMA 200: —
Current: $26.59
EMA 12: $38.26
EMA 26: $45.32
MACD: -7.0596 | Signal: -2.0643
BEARISH
ADX (14): 38.11
TREND
+DI: 8.06
−DI: 44.35
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 20.87
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 5.33
Stoch %D: 5.11
Williams %R: -99.45
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $67.60
BB Lower: $25.53
NEUTRAL
OBV: -19,068,864
Vol SMA 20: 1,740,233
Vol ROC: 109.63%
ATR: $4.32
True Range: $5.07
HV 20: 93.4%
HV 30: 98.0%
HV 60: 125.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 172
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-12-18T00:00:00 – 2026-10-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis
SHAZ Stock Analysis Report
SharonAI Inc. - Comprehensive Technical & Fundamental Assessment
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH with confidence level 7/10
Investment Thesis: SharonAI presents a classic divergence between positive news catalysts (NVIDIA partnership, $1.25B Australian expansion) and deteriorating technical conditions. While the company benefits from AI infrastructure tailwinds, the stock has experienced a severe drawdown from $55.88 (SMA 50) to $35.84 (-35.8%), accompanied by extremely weak momentum signals and high volatility. The options market is pricing significant uncertainty ($9.65 expected move), yet put/call ratios suggest some residual bullish positioning. Investors must weigh legitimate growth narratives against technical breakdown and oversold conditions that may portend further weakness before stabilization.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive news regarding the NVIDIA AI Factory deal (June 12, 2026) and Australian infrastructure expansion (April 1, 2026) have failed to arrest the downtrend, suggesting either execution concerns, valuation compression, or broader sector headwinds. The disconnect between positive headlines and price action is a critical red flag requiring monitoring.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Assessment | |-----------|-----------|------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | DOWNTREND | Price $35.84 trading far below all major moving averages (SMA 20: $51.23, SMA 50: $55.88) | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | DOWNTREND | Sustained breakdown below 50-day MA indicates loss of intermediate support | | Long-term (3-12 months) | UNCERTAIN | Missing SMA 200 data limits assessment; however, $55.88 to $35.84 move suggests significant deterioration |
Trend Strength: ADX reading of 28.40 confirms a strong trend (>20 = trending market), but directional indicators show a severe bearish bias: -DI of 41.59 vastly exceeds +DI of 10.61, indicating dominant selling pressure.
Support & Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Distance from Current | Significance | |-------|------|----------------------|--------------| | $36.95 | Support (Bollinger Lower Band) | -3.0% (CRITICAL) | Technical floor; breach could trigger capitulation | | $35.84 | Current Price | — | Testing lower Bollinger Band | | $51.23 | Resistance (SMA 20 / BB Middle) | +42.9% | Immediate upside resistance; significant gap to reclaim | | $55.88 | Resistance (SMA 50) | +55.9% | Major psychological level; would represent retracement to intermediate MA | | $65.51 | Resistance (Bollinger Upper Band) | +82.7% | Would require sustained recovery; currently far out of reach |
Critical Observation: The stock is trading within 0.3% of the lower Bollinger Band, indicating extreme oversold conditions with minimal downside cushion before technical floor breaks.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 27.46 — OVERSOLD
- Reading below 30 indicates extreme oversold conditions
- Historically, RSI <30 often precedes relief bounces or capitulation lows
- However, oversold does NOT equal bullish—price can remain depressed with RSI in this zone
- Signal: Contrarian buy setup IF accompanied by other confirmation signals (volume capitulation, positive divergence)
MACD: -4.81 (Line) vs -1.79 (Signal) / Histogram: -3.02
- MACD line below signal line = BEARISH alignment
- Negative histogram (-3.02) confirms downside momentum remains strong
- No bullish crossover visible; trend continuation likely
- Signal: Momentum continues lower; wait for histogram to shrink before considering reversal
Stochastic Oscillators: %K 3.11 / %D 3.88
- Extremely low readings (near 0) indicate severe oversold conditions across both fast and slow components
- Potential for relief bounce, but timing uncertain
- Signal: Capitulation likely near; bounce possible but not guaranteed
Williams %R: -97.32
- Reading near -100 indicates maximum oversold condition
- Suggests price near 14-period lows
- Signal: Confirms capitulation-level selling; extreme mean reversion candidate if sentiment shifts
Bollinger Bands Analysis
Current Position: Price at $35.84 touching the lower band ($36.95), with bands in a wide configuration (width 55.75).
Interpretation:
- Width of 55.75 suggests elevated volatility expectations; bands are significantly expanded
- Price at lower band = oversold condition requiring reversal signal or support break
- Historical precedent: Lower band touches often precede bounces, BUT only if volume capitulation or reversal signals appear
- Risk: Bands may continue to widen if volatility spikes further or downtrend accelerates
Volume Analysis
| Metric | Value | Assessment | |--------|-------|------------| | Current Volume vs SMA 20 | -26.06% Rate of Change | Volume DECLINING into lows — weak selling pressure signal | | On-Balance Volume (OBV) | -15,781,686.47 | Deeply negative; cumulative selling pressure sustained | | Volume SMA 20 | 1,481,875.40 | Below-average volume accompanies the decline |
Critical Insight: Recent volume decline (-26% rate of change) suggests institutional buyers are stepping aside, but also indicates the selling may be exhausted. True capitulation typically occurs on HIGH volume; here, the decline is occurring on DECLINING volume—a potential bullish divergence if reversal signals emerge.
Interpretation: Volume structure is mixed. The negative OBV and sustained selling pressure are bearish, but declining volume into lows could indicate a near-term bounce is possible. Institutional activity appears restrained, neither aggressively buying the dip nor panic-selling.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
| Date | Headline | Sentiment | Relevance | |------|----------|-----------|-----------| | 2026-06-12 | NVIDIA AI Factory Deal | POSITIVE | Major partnership; validates AI infrastructure positioning | | 2026-05-18 | "What's Going On With SharonAI On Monday?" | POSITIVE | Suggests recovery or rallies intraday; context unclear | | 2026-05-18 | Auddia/LT350 AI Infrastructure Benchmarks | NEUTRAL | Industry commentary; indirect relevance | | 2026-04-08 | New Era Energy Stock Offering | NEUTRAL | Generic capital raise; minimal stock impact | | 2026-04-01 | $1.25B Australian AI Cloud Expansion | POSITIVE | Major revenue catalyst; 12-18 month expansion play |
Sentiment Assessment
Aggregate Sentiment: POSITIVE (3 of 5 headlines bullish)
However, there is a critical divergence: Positive catalysts (NVIDIA deal, Australian expansion, May 18 bounce commentary) have failed to arrest the 35.8% decline from SMA 50. This suggests:
- Execution Risk: Market skeptical of company's ability to monetize partnerships
- Valuation Compression: Positive news already priced in at higher levels; repricing lower
- Sector Headwinds: Broader AI infrastructure pullback overriding company-specific positives
- Timing Mismatch: Growth catalysts (Australian deal) are 12-18 months out; market pricing near-term cash concerns
Catalyst Identification
Immediate (1-7 days):
- None identified; no regulatory approvals or earnings imminent
Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Potential momentum relief bounce if RSI/Stochastic mean revert (technical setup exists)
- Sector-level AI infrastructure trends (NVIDIA earnings, other AI players' guidance)
Medium-term (1-3 months):
- Next Earnings: 2026-11-05 (5 months away)
- Australian AI cloud expansion updates/milestones
- NVIDIA AI Factory partnership progress/revenue recognition
Longer-term (3-12 months):
- Full deployment of $1.25B Australian infrastructure
- Market validation of AI infrastructure pricing/demand
- Competitive dynamics in AI cloud services
Market Narrative vs. Technical Signals
**CONFL
Generated
News
All SHAZ news →
Earnings History
1 of 1 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
23.20%
Avg Actual Move
4.53%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | unknown | 23.20% | 4.53% | 0.20x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
SHAZ Options Activity & IV Rank
SHAZ IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 123.0%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $8.05
7-DTE Move: $2.20
Days to Exp: 35 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 6,810
Put Volume: 2,258
P/C Volume: 0.332
BULLISH
Call OI: 25,563
Put OI: 4,273
P/C OI: 0.167
Total OI: 29,836
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $3.90
ATM Put: $4.15
Call %: 14.7%
Put %: 15.6%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 19,751
Chain OI: 88,311
Last Updated: 10/16/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 20th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
20%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.16
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.17
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.09
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 10 ATM contracts, 3k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 122.2% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)46.4MediumOct 16
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$8.05Oct 16
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.2174
Alpha: -115.68%
Correlation: 0.2879
R-Squared: 8.3%
Stock Volatility: 146.8%
Market Volatility: 13.1%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 171
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 171
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own SHAZ
8 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $112.1M | #300 of 3716 | +91.0% | 13F | |
| Lone Pine Capital Hedge fund Stephen Mandel | $102.4M | #25 of 34 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $100.2M | #404 of 6285 | +1436.7% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $37.0M | #413 of 1945 | new | 13F | |
| Oaktree Capital Asset manager Howard Marks | $24.5M | #50 of 130 | -71.1% | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $6.2M | #152 of 251 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $1.5M | #2124 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $7K | #4147 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SHAZ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 10,896,438 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
12 filers$142.91M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $38.52M | 26.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Two Seas Capital LP | $32.34M | 22.63% | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $25.86M | 18.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $21.18M | 14.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $14.03M | 9.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | PEAK6 LLC | $2.62M | 1.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $2.12M | 1.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | SCOGGIN MANAGEMENT LP | $2.12M | 1.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | MOORE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP | $1.72M | 1.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.17M | 0.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $1.02M | 0.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | SYMMETRY PEAK MANAGEMENT LLC | $211.65K | 0.15% | 2026-06-30 |
8 filers$43.16M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $20.98M | 48.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $7.74M | 17.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $6.93M | 16.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $4.23M | 9.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Galaxy Digital Inc. | $1.69M | 3.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Centiva Capital, LP | $1.27M | 2.94% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $220.12K | 0.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | LuminArx Capital Management LP | $98.00K | 0.23% | 2026-06-30 |
SHAZ Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-17Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 | Situational Awareness LP | 10%+ Owner | Exer (X) | +2,674,823 | $0.00 | $267 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-24 | Anuj Goel | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +13,426 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Situational Awareness LP | 10%+ Owner | Exer (X) | +3,700,000 | $0.00 | $370 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-22 | Andrew Richard Penn | Director | Grant (A) | +46,944 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-25 | Nicholas Jeremy Hughes-Jones | Head of Corporate Development | Other (J) | +90,893 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-10 | Benjamin Carlton Adams | Director | Grant (A) | +10,973 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
SHAZ Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $26.59
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Situational Awareness LP | 10%+ Owner | 8,070,950 | $214.61M | $0 | 2 | 2026-09-17 |
| 2 | Nicholas Jeremy Hughes-Jones | Head of Corporate Development | 1,251,365 | $33.27M | $0 | 1 | 2026-03-25 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
23 ETFs hold SHAZ
23 shown · $16.86M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $8.1M | $78.9B | 2026-10-14 |
| 2 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $3.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $2.8M | $13.6B | 2026-10-14 |
| 4 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $934,712 | $1.3B | 2026-10-14 |
| 5 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.02% | $616,063 | $3.0B | 2026-10-14 |
| 6 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $568,222 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $296,639 | $10.9B | 2026-10-14 |
| 8 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.01% | $140,628 | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 9 | FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $112,468 | $21.7B | 2026-10-14 |
| 10 | AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $82,243 | $14.7B | 2026-10-14 |
| 11 | WSML iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $65,751 | $657.2M | 2026-10-14 |
| 12 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $43,844 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | MSML iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $37,262 | $272.2M | 2026-10-14 |
| 14 | RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF | Innovator | 0.04% | $33,171 | $94.2M | 2026-10-15 |
| 15 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.01% | $17,253 | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 16 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.01% | $13,653 | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 17 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $8,099 | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 18 | KBFR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF | Innovator | 0.03% | $4,530 | $13.2M | 2026-10-15 |
| 19 | SPGM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.00% | $3,101 | $1.8B | 2026-10-14 |
| 20 | AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $2,325 | $782.8M | 2026-10-14 |
| 21 | AVSU Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $1,519 | $485.7M | 2026-10-14 |
| 22 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $372 | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 23 | RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF | ProShares | 0.01% | $93 | — | 2026-10-15 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-26.68
TTM Revenue
$2.60M
TTM Net Income
$-450.80M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (1 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $1.93M | $-428.30M | $-22.84 | $30.69M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-08-06
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
0.26
P/S
111.34
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
-215.75
ROE
-40.0%
ROA
-19.4%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.90
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$289.74M
as of 2026-10-16
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
2.80M
SI % of Float
22.71%
Days to Cover
2.15
Short Vol Ratio
43.2%
Free Float
12.32M
Float %
74.2%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-16 • Float 2026-08-07