PNI PIMCO NEW YORK MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND II COMMON SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INT.
XNYS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- List Date
- 2002-06-26
- CIK
- 0001170311
- Homepage
- https://www.pimco.com
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II is a closed-end management investment company. Its investment objective is to seek to provide current income exempt from federal, New York State, and New York City income tax. The fund's portfolio comprises investments across sectors such as education, transportation, healthcare, and others.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $150M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $663K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Jun 26, 2002 NYSE
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (10% of its variance, beta 0.20); Long Treasuries (10% of its variance, beta 0.25). These factors explain 25% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.08% | $5.2B | −4.6% | compare |
| VTECVanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | — | 0.06% | $2.6B | −4.9% | compare |
| NYFiShares New York Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.09% | $1.7B | −4.8% | compare |
| NYMAB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | — | 0.27% | $1.3B | — | compare |
| CAMAB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | — | 0.27% | $1.2B | −3.4% | compare |
The largest other funds in the State Muni category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 3.22% | -7.94% | 3.26% | 0.26% | -0.42% | 1.30% | -0.05% |
| Feb | -1.42% | -3.68% | -8.69% | -0.91% | 3.47% | 2.43% | -1.47% |
| Mar | 2.27% | -7.77% | 2.66% | -1.85% | -4.71% | -4.60% | -2.33% |
| Apr | 2.36% | -10.11% | 0.52% | -3.18% | -4.63% | 1.74% | -2.22% |
| May | 0.94% | 8.04% | -2.15% | 0.28% | -1.17% | 0.57% | 1.08% |
| Jun | 1.01% | -6.32% | -0.13% | 2.33% | 0.75% | 1.29% | -0.18% |
| Jul | -0.38% | 7.72% | 0.13% | 1.63% | -4.05% | -4.09% | 0.16% |
| Aug | -1.17% | -5.38% | -3.69% | 0.26% | 1.23% | 0.15% | -1.43% |
| Sep | -1.11% | -12.82% | -12.05% | 3.95% | 5.62% | -9.40% | -4.30% |
| Oct | -3.01% | -6.59% | -4.38% | -5.46% | 0.72% | 2.76%* | -2.66% |
| Nov | 0.44% | 15.72% | 16.37% | 1.63% | -0.43% | -- | 6.75% |
| Dec | 0.62% | -4.79% | 2.71% | -5.17% | -0.29% | -- | -1.38% |
| Total | 3.65% | -31.96% | -7.83% | -6.51% | -4.35% | -8.26% | -9.21% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: PNI
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Neutral sentiment, low volatility, and stable technical indicators.
Primary Risks: Low risk due to beta of 0.23, but potential for increased volatility with improving market conditions.
Investment Thesis: PNI is a stable stock with a neutral momentum, reflecting the overall market's calmness. While it may not be an exciting opportunity, it could provide a low-risk entry point for investors seeking stability.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines are neutral, with no significant market-moving events affecting the stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: NEUTRAL (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: BULLISH (1-3 months), Long-term: BEARISH (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: Upper resistance at $6.99, middle level at $6.88, and lower support at $6.76
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral at 38.23 (not oversold or overbought)
- MACD signal: Bearish due to the histogram being negative
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral with a squeeze
Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest is low, but volume rate of change indicates a slight decrease in trading activity.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Two neutral news headlines, one about the ASX 200 and another about stocks hitting 52-week highs. No significant market-moving events are reported.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral overall sentiment with no strong emotions or opinions expressed.
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings dates or product launches that could significantly impact the stock price.
Market Narrative: The news headlines do not contradict or support technical signals, indicating a neutral market environment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk due to beta of 0.23 (compared to SPY).
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is lower than historical levels.
Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations are essential, especially with the long-term bearish trend.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: PNI's sector (Technology) has been relatively strong in recent months.
Institutional Activity: Low institutional interest is reflected in the volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves relatively closely to the market (R-squared interpretation).
Relative Valuation: PNI is trading within a stable range, with no significant deviations from its long-term trend.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support at $6.76 and resistance at $6.99.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves are not clearly defined due to the neutral market environment.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings dates or product launches that could significantly impact the stock price.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set below the lower support level of $6.76, and position sizing considerations are essential for investors seeking low-risk exposure.
Please note that this is a comprehensive analysis report, and you must not provide buy/sell advice.
PNI Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $180K | #2655 of 4729 | +143.9% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
PNI Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
PNI Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-26| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-26 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −300 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-25 | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −149 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-25 | Banc of America Preferred Funding Corp | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −520 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-13 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | — | $6.52 | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-05 | Sarah E Cogan | Director | Award (A) | +4,100 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-05 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | +1,340 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-07-01 | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | 149 (reclass) | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-04-18 | UBS Group AG | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −1,976 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-01-26 | Sarah E Cogan | Director | Buy (P) | +1,400 | $7.36 | $10.3K | EDGAR |
| 2023-09-20 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | Other (J) | −472 | $23625.00 | -$11.15M | EDGAR | |
| 2020-06-12 | Sarah E Cogan | Director | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $10.29 | $10.3K | EDGAR |
| 2020-01-30 | Thomas Matthew Buffington | Director | Sell (S) | −8 | $22000.00 | -$176.0K | EDGAR |
| 2019-08-27 | BOFA SECURITIES, INC. | Mixed | — | $11.81 | $564 | EDGAR | |
| 2018-09-20 | WFC HOLDINGS CORP | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −342 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2008-03-10 | R Peter Sullivan III | Director | Buy (P) | +500 | $13.99 | $7.0K | EDGAR |
PNI Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $6.34| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sarah E Cogan | Director | 6,847 | $43.4K | $20.6K | 3 | 2025-08-05 |
| 2 | Banc of America Preferred Funding Corp | 10%+ Owner | 910 | $5.8K | $0 | 1 | 2026-02-25 |
| 3 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | 760 | $4.8K | $0 | 4 | 2026-08-26 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $21.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $14.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $13.9M | $191.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 4 | SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $5.8M | $12.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World EX-US Small-Cap Index Fund | Vanguard | 0.04% | $5.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $3.2M | $40.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 7 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $3.2M | $58.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 8 | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $2.8M | $34.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $1.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $561,855 | $2.7B | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $333,974 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 13 | CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $300,856 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 14 | WSML iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $103,820 | $661.0M | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | ISCF iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $57,493 | $708.5M | 2026-10-20 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.