ESG Northern Trust STOXX US ESG Select ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Northern Trust STOXX US ESG Select ETF (ESG) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2016-07-13
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.32% prospectus, filed Aug 14, 2026
- Assets
- $133M shares × price, Nov 6, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 0.85% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $167K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 258 top 10 are 41.4%
- Listed
- Jul 13, 2016 Cboe BZX
- Tracking difference
- +0.09 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (99% of its variance, beta 0.94). These factors explain 93% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index SM (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 258 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Europe ETFs
- Jul 2026
- $0 latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$4.4M −3.3% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$12M −9.2% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | $0 |
| Jun 2026 | −$4.4M |
| May 2026 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | $0 |
| Mar 2026 | +$150K |
| Feb 2026 | $0 |
| Jan 2026 | $0 |
| Dec 2025 | −$4.0M |
| Nov 2025 | −$3.9M |
| Oct 2025 | $0 |
| Sep 2025 | −$11K |
| Aug 2025 | −$13K |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGGNorthern Trust STOXX Global ESG Select ETF | 63% | 0.42% | $115M | +15.0% | compare |
| SPYMState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 61% | 0.02% | $177.9B | +8.6% | compare |
| SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | 61% | 0.10% | $777.7B | +8.5% | compare |
| PBPInvesco S and P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 61% | 0.29% | $381M | −0.2% | compare |
| DFALDimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF | 61% | 0.12% | $1.7B | — | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +2.7% 25% under, 35% over · 97% covered
- Price / earnings
- 23.0 2% loss-making · 97% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 4.3 · 2.9 revenue growth +11.9%
- Above 200-day average
- 66% 57% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 1.8% of float, weighted · 3.1 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 5% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 67% net selling
- 13F holders
- +2.8% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 0.5% of weight in 7 days; 8.9% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase | MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 4.71% | 5.84% | +15.8% |
| Exit | CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. | 0.82% | — | — |
| New position | ABBVAbbVie, Inc. | — | 0.62% | — |
| Exit | HDHome Depot, Inc. (The) | 0.49% | — | — |
| Exit | PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.43% | — | — |
| Decrease | GILDGilead Sciences, Inc. | 0.61% | 0.22% | −61.4% |
| Exit | MRVLMarvell Technology, Inc. | 0.32% | — | — |
| New position | TMOThermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | — | 0.30% | — |
| New position | AMGNAmgen, Inc. | — | 0.29% | — |
| New position | SNDKSandisk Corp. | — | 0.25% | — |
19 new, 17 exited, 45 increased and 24 decreased between the fund's two latest holdings reports; turnover 9.1%. Full holdings and history
- Authorized participants
- 5 active of 24 with agreements; top 3 did 90%
- Created · redeemed
- $28M · $74M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 94% creations 88% in kind
- Creation unit
- 25,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 3.10% of assets on loan on average; earned 0.3 bp
- Return vs index
- +0.09 pts after fees; +0.47 before; daily s.d. 0.06
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-24 | $0.3452 | CD |
| 2026-06-18 | 2026-06-25 | $0.4077 | CD |
| 2026-03-20 | 2026-03-26 | $0.2807 | CD |
| 2025-12-19 | 2025-12-26 | $0.4668 | CD |
| 2025-09-19 | 2025-09-25 | $0.3810 | CD |
| 2025-06-20 | 2025-06-26 | $0.4097 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp. | 5.84% | Equity (common) | US |
| AAPL | Apple, Inc. | 5.12% | Equity (common) | US |
| AVGO | Broadcom, Inc. | 4.95% | Equity (common) | US |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp. | 4.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3.96% | Equity (common) | US |
| MU | Micron Technology, Inc. | 3.89% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMZN | Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.75% | Equity (common) | US |
| LLY | Eli Lilly & Co. | 3.42% | Equity (common) | US |
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. | 3.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| XOM | ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 2.70% | Equity (common) | US |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 2.59% | Equity (common) | US |
| WMT | Walmart, Inc. | 2.07% | Equity (common) | US |
| COST | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 1.47% | Equity (common) | US |
| TSLA | Tesla, Inc. | 1.46% | Equity (common) | US |
| KO | Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.44% | Equity (common) | US |
| PG | Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 1.40% | Equity (common) | US |
| MRK | Merck & Co., Inc. | 1.36% | Equity (common) | US |
| V | Visa, Inc. | 1.27% | Equity (common) | US |
| BAC | Bank of America Corp. | 1.15% | Equity (common) | US |
| WFC | Wells Fargo & Co. | 1.12% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1.09% | Equity (common) | US |
| CAT | Caterpillar, Inc. | 1.06% | Equity (common) | US |
| C | Citigroup, Inc. | 0.96% | Equity (common) | US |
| IBM | International Business Machines Corp. | 0.89% | Equity (common) | US |
| INTC | Intel Corp. | 0.88% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | CF SECURED LLC | 0.71% | Repurchase agreement | US |
| BLK | Blackrock, Inc. | 0.67% | Equity (common) | US |
| PEP | PepsiCo, Inc. | 0.66% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABT | Abbott Laboratories | 0.66% | Equity (common) | US |
| MA | Mastercard, Inc. | 0.65% | Equity (common) | US |
| GS | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) | 0.62% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABBV | AbbVie, Inc. | 0.62% | Equity (common) | US |
| TJX | TJX Cos., Inc. (The) | 0.61% | Equity (common) | US |
| GEV | GE Vernova, Inc. | 0.56% | Equity (common) | US |
| PGR | Progressive Corp. (The) | 0.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| SYK | Stryker Corp. | 0.49% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Linde plc | 0.47% | Equity (common) | US |
| WELL | Welltower, Inc. | 0.46% | Equity (common) | US |
| ISRG | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 0.44% | Equity (common) | US |
| QCOM | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 0.44% | Equity (common) | US |
| VRTX | Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.43% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Trane Technologies plc | 0.42% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Accenture plc | 0.42% | Equity (common) | US |
| EQIX | Equinix, Inc. | 0.42% | Equity (common) | US |
| BKNG | Booking Holdings, Inc. | 0.41% | Equity (common) | US |
| ANET | Arista Networks, Inc. | 0.41% | Equity (common) | US |
| VZ | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 0.40% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRWD | Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.40% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADP | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.38% | Equity (common) | US |
| BNY | Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The) | 0.37% | Equity (common) | US |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.85% | -5.87% | 7.13% | 1.92% | 4.76% | 1.75% | 1.76% |
| Feb | 0.96% | -4.89% | -3.25% | 4.45% | -0.38% | -1.39% | -0.75% |
| Mar | 2.18% | 4.95% | 3.91% | 1.18% | -4.55% | -4.95% | 0.45% |
| Apr | 3.77% | -9.64% | 1.58% | -4.24% | -1.46% | 8.37% | -0.27% |
| May | 0.36% | -0.53% | 0.25% | 3.34% | 5.37% | 5.72% | 2.42% |
| Jun | 2.71% | -8.76% | 5.34% | 3.15% | 3.85% | -0.44% | 0.97% |
| Jul | 1.84% | 8.84% | 3.02% | 1.11% | 0.70% | 0.57% | 2.68% |
| Aug | 3.35% | -3.90% | -0.97% | 3.84% | 3.49% | 2.45% | 1.38% |
| Sep | -4.79% | -9.11% | -4.45% | 3.39% | 2.94% | -0.72% | -2.12% |
| Oct | 6.03% | 5.75% | -2.64% | -1.12% | 1.29% | 1.52% | 1.80% |
| Nov | -1.07% | 5.56% | 7.70% | 6.17% | 0.14% | -0.19%* | 3.05% |
| Dec | 4.94% | -6.41% | 3.28% | -3.35% | 1.11% | -- | -0.09% |
| Total | 22.76% | -23.47% | 21.97% | 21.10% | 18.18% | 12.75% | 12.21% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for ESG:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Technical momentum, moderate volatility, and lack of significant news catalysts.
Primary Risks: Overbought RSI, potential mean reversion, and market risk due to beta proximity to the S&P 500.
Investment Thesis: ESG is likely to consolidate its recent gains or experience a minor pullback before resuming its uptrend. Investors should focus on risk management and position sizing.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Neutral news headlines do not strongly influence the stock's technical momentum, which remains driven by internal factors.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish, Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral, Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 50: $163.87
- Upper Bollinger Band: $177.56
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Overbought (>70), potential sell signal
- MACD signal: Bullish (crossover above signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, breakout, mean reversion
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines do not strongly influence the stock's technical momentum.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment overall.
Catalyst Identification: No significant upcoming events or earnings releases that could impact the stock's price.
Market Narrative: Technical signals remain strong, but the lack of recent news catalysts may lead to consolidation or a minor pullback.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Moderate volatility (beta 0.91), suggesting some risk relative to the S&P 500.
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Moderate (HV20 10.0%, HV30 9.9%).
Options Market Signals: No options data available, but IV premium is positive, indicating implied richness relative to realized volatility.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ESG's performance aligns with its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but no significant buying or selling pressure.
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation: 0.97, indicating strong correlation with the S&P 500.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 50: $163.87
- Upper Bollinger Band: $177.56
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No significant levels to monitor, as the stock is already overbought and near its upper band.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming events or earnings releases that could impact the stock's price.
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at SMA 50 or lower Bollinger Band, with position sizing considering the moderate volatility and risk profile.
ESG Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
ESG Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 27 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|